000 | a | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c30916 _d30916 |
||
008 | 220616b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9780674768680 | ||
082 |
_a320.5209 _bHIR |
||
100 | _aHirschman, Albert O. | ||
245 | _aRhetoric of reaction : perversity, futility, jeopardy | ||
260 |
_bHarvard University Press, _c1991 _aCambridge : |
||
300 |
_axi, 197 p. ; _c21 cm |
||
365 |
_b33.00 _cUSD _d81.20 |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
520 | _aHirschman maps the diffuse and treacherous world of reactionary rhetoric in which conservative public figures, thinkers, and polemicists have been arguing against progressive agendas and reforms for 200 years. Ultimately, he shows that progressives are apt to employ related rhetorical postures, which are as biased as their reactionary counterparts. | ||
650 | _aConservatism | ||
650 | _aPoor laws | ||
650 | _aWelfare state | ||
650 | _aProvidence State | ||
650 | _aBeveridge Report | ||
650 | _a Class distinction | ||
650 | _aEuropean tradition | ||
650 | _a Corn laws | ||
650 | _aFracasomania | ||
650 | _a Futility thesis | ||
650 | _aIncome redistribution | ||
650 | _aJeopardy thesis | ||
650 | _aMarkets:self-regulating | ||
650 | _aOligarchy,Iron law | ||
650 | _aPerversity thesis | ||
650 | _a Reform Act | ||
650 | _aSocial welfare development | ||
650 | _aUnemployment compensation | ||
650 | _aWelfare state | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |