000 a
999 _c31980
_d31980
008 230417b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020 _a9780691214955
082 _a300.1
_bMAH
100 _aMahoney, James
245 _aLogic of social science
260 _bPrinceton University Press,
_a Princeton :
_c2021
300 _axvi, 390 p. ;
_bill.,
_c24 cm
365 _b35.00
_cUSD
_d85.90
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 _aMahoney's starting point is the problem of essentialism in social science. Essentialism--the belief that the members of a category possess hidden properties ("essences") that make them members of the category and that endow them with a certain nature--is appropriate for scientific categories ("atoms", for instance) but not for human ones ("revolutions," for instance). Despite this, much social science research takes place from within an essentialist orientation; those who reject this assumption goes so far in the other direction as to reject the idea of an external reality, independent of human beings, altogether. Mahoney proposes an alternative approach that aspires to bridge this enduring rift in the social sciences between those who take a scientific approach and assume that social science categories correspond to external reality (and thus believe that the methods used in the natural sciences are generally appropriate for the social sciences) and those who take a constructivist approach and believe that because the categories used to understand the social world are humanly-constructed, they cannot possibly follow the science of the natural world. As the name suggests, scientific constructivism brings in aspects of both views and attempts to unite them. Drawing from cognitive science, it focuses on using the rational parts of our brain machinery to overcome the limitations and deeply seated biases (such as essentialism) of our evolved minds. Specifically, Mahoney puts forth a "set-theoretic analysis" that focuses on "sets" of categories as they exist in the mind that are also subject to the mathematical logic of set-theory. He spends the first four chapters of the book establishing the foundations and methods for set-theoretic analysis, the next four chapters looking and how this analysis fits with the existing tools of social science, and the final four chapters focusing on how this approach can be used to study and understand cases.
650 _aTemporality
650 _a Causality
650 _aCounterfactual cases
650 _aFalse consciousness
650 _aINUS
650 _aMaterialism
650 _aPossiible world
650 _aRealism
650 _aTheory frame
650 _aEssentialist biases
650 _aProposition testing
650 _aSequence analysis
942 _2ddc
_cBK