000 | a | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c32088 _d32088 |
||
008 | 230522b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9780674293991 | ||
082 |
_a201.720954 _bNAI |
||
100 | _aNair, Neeti | ||
245 | _aHurt sentiments : secularism and belonging in South Asia | ||
260 |
_bHarvard University Press, _c2023 _aCambridge : |
||
300 |
_a333 p. ; _bill., _c25 cm |
||
365 |
_b699.00 _cINR _d01 |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
520 | _aAt the time of Partition and the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947, it was widely expected that India would be "secular," home to members of different religious traditions and communities, whereas Pakistan would be a homeland for Muslims, and an Islamic state. Seventy-five years later, India is on the precipice of declaring itself a Hindu Rashtra, a Hindu state, whereas Pakistan has drawn increasingly narrow interpretations of what it means to be an Islamic state. Pakistan's once-eastern wing, now the independent nation-state of Bangladesh, has oscillated between professions of secularism and an Islamic ideology. Neeti Nair reveals how the various ideologies of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh that were first debated in their constituent assemblies, evolved to support the claims of "hurt sentiments" of majoritarian communities - Hindus in India, and Muslims in Pakistan and Bangladesh. | ||
650 | _aBangladesh, History | ||
650 | _aIndia History Partition, 1947 | ||
650 | _aSecularism | ||
650 | _aReligious intolerance | ||
650 | _a Persecution | ||
650 | _aIslam | ||
650 | _aHinduism | ||
650 | _aBharaytiya Janata Party(BJP) | ||
650 | _a Communalism | ||
650 | _a Frontier Provinces | ||
650 | _aMohatma Gandhi | ||
650 | _aKhan, Muhammad Ayub | ||
650 | _a Muslim League | ||
650 | _aNehru,Jawaharlal | ||
650 | _aRahman, Sheikh Mujibar | ||
650 | _aReligious minorities | ||
650 | _aTwo-nation theory | ||
650 | _aNathuram Godse | ||
650 | _aTrade Unions | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |